|
|
|
|
|
|
by dynamic
4384 days ago
|
|
|
He isn't saying that there's a possibility "however remote"; he's saying that we have absolutely no reason to prefer one explanation over another. "So although we have seen evidence for it time and time again": you're begging the question and assuming the principle of induction, which is exactly what Hume is saying you can't justify. |
|
|