|
|
|
|
|
by opendais
4386 days ago
|
|
Maybe, but everyone keeps overlooking the fact that if they get regulated like a taxi is...a massive chunk of their advantage vanishes. That 90k to 30k figure for instance?
http://betabeat.com/2014/05/new-york-city-taxi-medallion-man... They don't pay the $.50 per trip tax or buying the taxi medallions which lease ~$2,500/month.
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-02-28/if-uber-is-k... Mysteriously, if Uber had to spend $35k+ [or eat a one time capital expenditure of 6-7 figures per driver] more a driver, I suspect people would be thinking the $18 billion valuation was ludicrous. And realistically, since they act as a taxi service, that is what they would be paying in markets like SF, NY, etc. They clearly would have a competitive advantage in the range of $25k/driver + taxi company like margins, but does that really justify an 18 billion dollar valuation even if you tack on a courier service? |
|
It's also somewhat rosy to think that Uber will eat the entire market. I'm not sure an 18B valuation makes sense. Maybe a few billion, but not 18.
(I say this as someone who drives for Uber - and Lyft)