[matnewton85]

Ok, I think this is just a perspective thing.

You're (most likely) coming from a CS background, I come from a user testing background.

If someone sits me down and says "use my site, have a conversation with a 13 year old Ukrainian".. I start having a conversation with a 13 year old Ukrainian.

Someone sits a CS major down with Eugene, the 13 year old Ukrainian, he'll drop references to AI reserch from the 60s. Something that probably one or two Ukrainian kids could ever answer.

[marcus_holmes]

but these bots won't cope with not being able to answer, because the human response (to learn) isn't open to them. If you sit down with a human and start talking about something they don't know, then usually (in a situation free from conflict or other emotional prompts) their curiosity prompts them to start asking questions and building a mental model of the subject that prompts further questions and they learn about the subject. The conversation builds on the learning and a real progression of thought ensues.

The chatbots can't do this, except in the most limited of ways ($job="CS scientist"), so they don't appear human.

[matnewton85]

Great point.

[cmiles74]

Chatbots seem like people when you stick to their script (or on of their conversation paths). Vary even a little and the whole charade is exposed.