[hashtag]

1. The author chose to blatantly ignore clear signs of a problem.

2. Then proceeds to make all sorts of insane and stupid reasoning to defend what is obviously his problem for ignoring the issues.

3. Even after the lifetime ban came in, he chooses to ignore the problem was with him and what he chose to do, and instead still holds his innocence and expects someone on Google's end will realize their mistake when in fact it was his.

I believe a lifetime is a bit too harsh. But I also believe that when someone makes a mistake and doesn't bother to realize the problem themselves and instead continue to cry innocence like a dunce, they probably should remain banned until they get a clue.

Also the argument that others got away with it is NEVER a good argument for why you should be allowed to do something (not saying thats what he said) or that it should be okay for you in any way (something he did say).