[snail22]

Yet another poseur "designer" who clearly hasn't read Edward Tufte's books, and has made crucial mistakes such as making the graphs less accurate than they were before and adding additional extraneous clutter (such as those extra icons) on top of the original information. Real design is supposed to make information more legible, not less, and it doesn't necessarily have anything to do with how slick or "pretty" the end result appears to be.

[mistermcgruff]

Tufte is only one perspective. And he's irritatingly preachy at times. Hell, this is his favorite website: http://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?lat=33.769373434837...

Are the folks at NOAA non-poseurs? Is the height of design just to vomit all the information on a single canvas, because Tufte thinks "our eyes can handle it?"

[leorocky]

Tufte is only one perspective? The point is that information is more important than presentation. Making something pretty should never reduce the accessibility of the information or take away information. Mary's slides are much more informative than the redone slides. If there's a perspective that stresses pretty over getting information that's an incorrect perspective.

Decluttering can increase access to information, but again it's all about getting people to get the information, not admire your ability to draw pretty icons and pick fancy colors.

[prepend]

I've been running into many designers who focus more on looking cool rather than information being used appropriately.

Meeker did a good job of cramming tons of info and data into a concise presentation. It's probably the most data dense presentation I've seen in a long time.

This seems like a case where De Cubber was just trying to change the presentation, rather than improve it. For example: "Finally, he got rid of an unnecessary color block at the top and the firm’s logo at the bottom to eliminate clutter and create some breathing space."

Removing the firm logo from an analysis presentation is surreally stupid as the analysis is meant to create prestige for the firm.

[avn2109]

In defense of the redesign, it has improved the data-ink ratio and removed annoying gradients/visual noise on several slides (looking particularly at the chart on slide 22 here).

Though Tufte would throw a fit at those circular charts.

[fastball]

"Real" design?

No true scotsman.

[sp332]

Snail22 isn't complaining that the result's not perfect. It's that it's not even moving the right direction. The new "design" is strictly worse than the original.

[eykanal]

Replace "real" with "informative, easily interpretable, and intuitive". The point still stands.