Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sambrand 4399 days ago
He suggests he won't relocate the team to Seattle (doing so would be "value destructive"). But I wonder if this purchase itself destroys the value of his own net worth. That's a lot of money to pay for what was just a few years ago the hallmark of a terrible pro sports franchise.
4 comments

The NBA has more of a chance than any other sport to become truly global.

American football has had a hard time expanding and will deal with injuries in the future, soccer (sic) is already global, just not popular here, baseball is an entrenched classic, and hockey has always been regional.

The fact that the Clippers went from a laughing stock a few years back to where they are now actually says a lot. They'll probably get to keep Paul and Griffin now that Sterling is gone, and due to the Lakers being bad they have a massive market to tap into.

Yeah they won't be worth more than his investment any time soon, but in 20 years? That's not out of the question. Not to mention unless you are Donald Sterling or someone like him you don't usually buy a team to make money, you buy it cause there are only 30 other people in the world that get to do it. That's priceless.

Purchasing the clippers will not decrease his net worth. Owning a major sports franchise especially one in a major market will always be profitable. You're guaranteed to turn a profit every single year. Gate tickets, TV contracts, merchandise, and profit sharing are all very good revenue source for a sports team. He also doesn't have to pay money to build a new arena because Clippers just pay rent to play at Staples Center.

Sports is one of the few businesses that will thrive under any economic condition. There will always be fans that shell out money to watch their team.

Donald Sterling always made money from the Clippers from the year he bought it. Just continuing the operations as they are today would put Ballmer in the black on this "investment". (I imagine owning a Sports team probably has some tax advantage loopholes too)

Not to mention Larry Ellison's purchase of Lanai island for $500MM+. Now that is a terrible purchase from a investment standpoint, but hey, the guy was $40BB+, so it's chump change you know? :(

According to the article Ballmer has ~$20B. 10% is significant, but not exactly "destroy[ing] the value of his own net worth."
According to Wikipedia, Ballmer joined Microsoft as employee #30 in 1980.

A year later, in 1981, when Microsoft incorporated, Ballmer held 8% of the shares.

That was a pretty neat trick.

My google-fu seems to be failing me, does anyone know how exactly he obtained an 8% stake in the company in a single year?