Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by maxerickson 4400 days ago
Why not call it a risky investment? He ended up with a big ownership stake, he wasn't just supporting them for the hell of it.
1 comments

The UK isn't supporting Skylon "for the hell of it", either. Their taxpayers would likely be pretty happy to have the next Boeing/Airbus live on their soil.
I guess it's just a pet peeve of mine when people call a private, profitable financial arrangement a subsidy.

I complain about the usage for cell phones too.

Both situations involve someone with money taking a bet on a currently non-profitable venture hoping it'll pay off in the future. SpaceX wasn't profitable when Musk put money in.
Note that one of the partners is QinetiQ, the privatized wing of the UK defence research establishment. There's a strategic interest here too.