Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by joeblau 4400 days ago
Not even Mercurial :) Haha j/k I actually don't mind Mercurial, but I'd still rather work with git.
1 comments

They're essentially identical. Mercurial just has slightly easier to understand syntax and and a cultural bias against rebasing.
Nope. Mercurial devs rebase heavily during Mercurial development, for instance. It's Changeset Evolution [1] that makes history rewriting _safe_.

[1]: http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/ChangesetEvolution