Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by raiph 4398 days ago
I hope I'm being helpful. There's definitely a glass half full / half empty dilemma with talking about P6.

Let me now include a standard caveat list I created last year in an attempt to ensure balance in the force:

"Perl 6 is not remotely as usable and useful as Perl 5; it has dozens of users, not millions; it is 100-1000x slower than Perl 5 for a lot of stuff; the P6 documentation is immature and incomplete; the spec has not reached 6.0.0; the Rakudo compiler has not fully implemented what's already in the spec; most of the concurrency and parallel implementation has only just begun; P6 can not currently use CPAN modules; Perl 6 has syntax and semantics that are not backwards compatible with Perl 5; Perl 6 culture is -Ofun which some think is incompatible with getting things done; some folk think that Perl 6 code looks like line noise... In summary, there are infinitely many things wrong with P6."

I hope that hasn't brought you down to earth with too big a bump.