|
|
|
|
|
by amrit_b
4399 days ago
|
|
1> Frankly speaking I have no idea. If there are more than one buyer, then will give it to the higher payer. 2> Right now, users are using a free version - so no income. 3> As far as I know, there is no other product in the market with makes video transcoding this simple. So I don't think its tough to get users. 4> From a developer's prospective, it only needs a "forgot password" function before it can go to production. Everything else is ready. 5, 6> Here are the details -> http://amritbera.com/journal/why-i-built-transcode-io (transcode.io is a completely different thing - its code-less transcoding and CDN hosting) |
|
3. From what I've seen customer acquisition is the key challenge of any startup. If you can acquire customers for less than their life time value then you are set!
Without a process to acquire customers your business is much less valuable.
Someone would likely pay more for transcoder.io if it had a scalable way to acquire customers but no tech, vs what you have which is tech but no customer acquistion.
5, 6. I did read that blog post before posting the questions.
From the end user perspective they just want their videos transcoded, it seems like all 3 of these services do that. I was hoping you could summarize the tl;dr of why someone would use your service to get their videos transcoded vs someone else's.