The sun can also be an energy source to make syn-gas (to make synthetic gasoline for cars), or charge a battery, or make hydrogen, or pump water uphill.
What does that have to do with silicon as a carrier? Absolutely nothing. You can also make silicon if you burn some coal. The sun is completely irrelevant.
> Why did I mention recycling the media? It's mentioned in the article. Twice in fact.
Just because it's in an article doesn't make it correct. This article is really bad. It has just enough truth to make it seem plausible.
The crust of this entire planet is made of silicon, it's not something that needs recycling anyway.
>The sun can also be an energy source to make syn-gas (to make synthetic gasoline for cars), or charge a battery, or make hydrogen, or pump water uphill. What does that have to do with silicon as a carrier?
It has to do with using the sun to produce the energy that the "carrier" will carry.
Nobody said the Sun only has this particular application -- just that is one more application of Solar energy (on sand, and with using silicon as a carrier).
>Just because it's in an article doesn't make it correct. This article is really bad. It has just enough truth to make it seem plausible.
The sun can also be an energy source to make syn-gas (to make synthetic gasoline for cars), or charge a battery, or make hydrogen, or pump water uphill.
What does that have to do with silicon as a carrier? Absolutely nothing. You can also make silicon if you burn some coal. The sun is completely irrelevant.
> Why did I mention recycling the media? It's mentioned in the article. Twice in fact.
Just because it's in an article doesn't make it correct. This article is really bad. It has just enough truth to make it seem plausible.
The crust of this entire planet is made of silicon, it's not something that needs recycling anyway.