Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by cantbuyahouse 4420 days ago
Not SF, but my wife and I are trying to buy a house in Silicon Valley. I can't imagine how this market is sustainable, but all the evidence is that there is no hope for improvement. It's disheartening to say the least.

My wife and I are ~30 years old, have $500k in cash saved, and our combined salary is ~230k. So we are in the upper upper range of earners, and not looking for sympathy. But even with that, we are unable to buy a house or townhouse in mid-range neighborhoods here. The houses all go for 1.3-1.5 M. I don't see that ever being feasible for us.

I don't know that I have a point, other than an anecdote of what this looks like on the ground. I know we could commute or move to a lesser area, but how are there enough people to maintain the volume of ongoing purchases of all these $1.5M houses?

4 comments

Was there a typo in your message? Why would you be unable to afford a home that you could immediately put down a 33% down payment in cash for?
That would work out to $6600 a month for mortgage, insurance, and property tax. Or over half of our take home pay.
Recently, news was indicating that people were considering homes as an investment again. This is likely what is fueling these prices.

I guess, I would say, you should use your "gut-feelings." If something doesn't feel right, something probably isn't right.

It seems like you are just being too picky. You could easily afford a median house or even a house that is well above the median.
Right, this throwaway account is misnamed. My point is not that I can't buy a house, because I could easily move further away or move somewhere with lousy schools or get a small condo. It's that the majority of houses in the city we live in are out of our reach, despite how well off we are (median price in MV is > $1M). And so it boggles my mind how there are enough people in perpetuity to maintain these prices.
Look in Fremont. Mediocre suburbia and no downtown, but decent houses and schools