|
|
|
|
|
|
by aeturnum
4416 days ago
|
|
|
She's saying that, in her view, people should own their information. Where Google (or anyone else) chooses to store it, should not be an excuse for denying what she sees as the right to manage that information. At a high level, I imagine she would support a law that requires all information that can be associated with an individual (google account, ip address, etc) to be stored with metadata tracing it back to that identity and require that companies be able to remove all the data by metadata. What do people find confusing about the quote? It seems like pretty standard politician to me. |
|
|
What does that have to do with linking to a factually true news story about a guy? It seems a lot more like she's trying to conflate things for a soundbite.
In any case, making all statements that are about information about someone transitively "personal information" seems like an awfully bad idea. That's great when Google can track an account or an IP address, but where's the metadata for Mario Gonzalez to be found in a newspaper's story about Mario Gonzalez? And considering that news stories are often about more than one thing, what's the balance when a story is about someone who wants the event to be forgotten and someone who doesn't (or it's important that it's not)?