[serf]

>if chemical analysis of your tissues can provide useful information for recruitment we should embrace it.

I disagree.

There are no fields in which poor health is an advantage. So, that idea extrapolated, their are no jobs which wouldn't benefit in some way from having the most healthy staff possible.

I'm of the opinion that it is the job of recruitment staff to secure employees who are capable of doing the job that's asked of them, capable of advancement, and capable of a degree of amiability which will allow them to work well with the other parts of the system.

If chemical analysis were to be used normally in the course of recruitment, it'd no longer be a game of determining if the candidate was capable of the task, but rather a min-maxing of attributes which would be expected to produce a company with the results desired.

Simply put : I, too, fear that chemical composition is far too simple a criteria to judge a possible (human) candidate on.