[rayiner]

Non-profits have less resources with which to protect themselves, and have value to the public that goes beyond their money-making function. Theres not necessarily much money but a lot of value in protecting say dissident speech.

[selmnoo]

On the whole, sure, probably non-profits have less resources -- but there are many glaring exceptions. MIT and Harvard are sitting on a shitload of cash, for example. NFL as well. You know that NFL charges customers something like $150 for streaming access for one year? (http://www.nfl.com/watch-nfl-live ) And a lot of people pay for it. Should NFL pay up to Comcast for clogging the tubes football-season, just like Netflix does, even though it's a non-profit?