|
|
|
|
|
by Kenji
4421 days ago
|
|
That's interesting. I once took a sociology class about the behaviour of panicking crowds and we covered exactly this phenomenon, that is, if you put a pillar in front of the emergency exit (without completely blocking it, of course), panicking people can get out faster. It seems counterintuitive but it's been shown numerous times. |
|
When you have one exit and it's blocked due to many people attempting to fit at once, the entire queue is congested.
That barrier turns one exit into two exits (even if it's backed by only one real exit). If one is congested, people can still flow through the other one, and vice versa.
This explains why the evacuation rate is roughly twice faster.
If the barrier is designed to even more virtual exits, it'll be even faster.
And there's an even faster way, that requires no architectural changes, but people will have to be trained in it so well, that they'd follow it even in panic.
And this would be some heuristic which orders people in an unambiguous way, so only one person is attempting to exit at a given moment.
I don't know, left to right order, split in rows, people holding hands... Some creative solution is required to decide what that heuristic would be.
Queues have no congestion, so they'll represent the fastest possible rate of evacuation through a single exit.