|
|
|
|
|
by yummyfajitas
6143 days ago
|
|
Nice article. I'd also point out Alex Tabarrok, who makes a good counterpoint about HF trading. His argument is that high frequency trading has only minimal societal value (positive or negative), but strongly influences the distribution of gains and thus may cause an overinvestment of resources. Read it here: http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2009/08... |
|
Any other trading functions can be thought of as picking up alpha that other, less nimble, market participants are leaving on the table. That's the redistributionist part he's talking about there, but actually this is positive for society also because it increases liquidity also and makes the market more efficient. I also think that in general it's positive for society for the smartest and best people in a particular endeavour to be well-rewarded, because that gives a strong incentive to other smart people to step into the field.
Most of the carping about HFT comes from people who are losing business because they can't compete. Instead of moaning they should hire a roomful of brilliant programmers and write their own winning algos.