[stuki]

Just for clarification, wouldn't it appear that RBS was in violation of licensing terms even when it owned LaSalle, by using the software corporation wide, despite it only being licensed by a subsidiary?

Otherwise, you'd think there would be a huge market for tiny little companies that happened to have a "site license" for some expensive software.

I still think the judge, or some other authority, should put a cap on the price Complex Systems could charge, rather than leaving RBS completely at the mercy of their vendor. Perhaps the appeals court will.