[profquail]

So it's not actually the type inference that's the problem -- it's developers who carelessly define implicit conversion operators on their classes.

[JoeAltmaier]

Strings have built-in conversion, right?

[nanofortnight]

The only built-in implicit conversions in C# are for numerics, and there isn't a loss in precision for those (with the exception of int/uint/long/ulong -> float and long/ulong -> double, where there is a loss of precision).

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/y5b434w4.aspx

     int i = "5"; 

would not work.

[recursive]

Not the kind you seem to be thinking of.