|
|
|
|
|
|
by jameshart
4422 days ago
|
|
|
So this "fat JSON" problem is Java's problem, not JSON's, then? The above code could be perfectly valid C#, as well as valid JavaScript. On the other hand, if you're hardcoding assumptions about the JSON structure into your Java (which you're doing even if you pass a string literal to some API to look up a value for you), you could probably employ some lightweight code generation to spin you up some classes with strongly typed public fields named things like 'them' and 'public_keys' to help you write more idiomatic JSON access code. |
|
|
Pretty much.
I would expect that Java could offer some sort of solution to this problem, ideally with an accessor syntax similar to what you'd find in Javascript or, as you say, C#. On the other hand, I've never delved deeply enough into Java to know whether it's feasible; I suppose it's possible that the language simply isn't flexible enough to make such a solution workable.