Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by a1a 4434 days ago
I think the biggest problem here is that the application claims to be "anti-surveillance" yet it doesn't really solve the surveillance problem, namely meta-data.

If anything this application helps surveillance by filtering out the communication from "regular" communication.

We have had encrypted messaging for ages now. I cannot tell what's new here.

1 comments

Has anyone even publicly discussed how to mitigate metadata collection? I don't recall any such discussion, but this also isn't really my area of interest.

I'd imagine a system that's completely a p2p mesh network. "Oh, hello, peer. I have 17 blocks for delivery on the network." Those 17 blocks might be pieces of messages for said peer; they might be destined for other nodes anywhere in the network; maybe they're noise. And don't forget to hand those blocks off to other nodes as well, because maliciously dumping blocks could be a thing...

Not really my topic either but I guess messaging via TOR or alike is the best solution.
Perhaps, but then I believe each participant in the messaging system would need to run a hidden service to receive messages. I think you may be onto something here.