| (I'm not parent, I'm the one who originally asked the question.) Certainly, a _scientific theory_ is judged based on its predictive power. This is why I mentioned my opinion, earlier, that science is "the art of useful fiction." The goal isn't to achieve truth but to predict. Philosophy, on the other hand, is concerned with what is _really_ true, not predictions. Certainly, the experience of qualia has no effect demonstrable to an outside observer. That doesn't make it any more or less real. I experience, therefore it must exist. I merely can't prove it to you. The great thing is that you can prove it to yourself. All you have to do is pause for a moment and rationally examine what you feel. If your interested in an attempt to explain it from a materialist perspective, you may wish to look at Roger Penrose _The Emperor's New Mind_. He argues that consciousness is intricately tied to QM. Or at least I think he does... It's difficult reading and I haven't read the whole thing yet! It's on Google Books, here: http://books.google.ca/books?id=oI0grArWHUMC&dq=The+Empe... The first chapter provides an excellent explanation of qualia. |