|
|
|
|
|
by j2kun
4423 days ago
|
|
I think your argument is avoiding the real issues. One problem is that the simplification of setting y = x^y introduces new solutions that are not solutions to the original equation. While any solution of the original must also satisfy y = x^y, the reverse is not true. Even worse, the OP's algebraic manipulations assume there exists a solution to the equation. It's not logically sound to assume something exists and use that fact to prove that it exists. |
|