|
|
|
|
|
|
by chrisBob
4435 days ago
|
|
|
Right. It may not be that it is done maliciously, It could be related to the time it takes to notice strange activity, and then act on it. It also makes good business sense to review before a payment.
If there really was fraudulent activity it would be a bad idea to pay based on that. One important issue that is also missing from this discussion is how Google refunds advertisers. I know I have heard from advertisers who got money back from click fraud. |
|
|