|
|
|
|
|
|
by bdfh42
4432 days ago
|
|
|
OK I agree, XSD was just a way for pedants to be a pain. But, any form of structured communication that works for humans (and this is a mark-up language that is supposed to work in the human as well as machine spheres) has to include a degree of apparent redundancy that actually applies clarity - well at least avoids ambiguity. My preference is always JSON but XML is cool when it flows and has available tools. |
|
|
That's just excuses ("having tools") for failing (on an aspect)
If flows ? :-)
It's been a great contribution thank you TBL! Thank you. (Let's move on)
> for pedants to be a pain
:-) (strange) computer scientists "we are interested in formal completeness" WHAT ?!