|
|
|
|
|
by chacham15
4437 days ago
|
|
When I hear these arguments, I always look for what is wrong with OCSP Must Staple. The author says that at the bottom it might be a solution with short lived certs, but I dont see the need for super short lived certs, only short lived OCSP staples. The author presents this as the problem: > if the attacker still has control of the site, they can hop from CA to CA getting certificates. (And they will have the full OCSP validity period to use after each revocation.) The solution here is to not allow OCSP stapling to request a new certificate and use a full OCSP check to verify that the cert wasnt revoked. |
|