In my opinion, the report should be more detailed, to be considered as "transparency report". I.e. what exactly was 760 EUR / speaker spent on? What is "misc"? Who were the sponsors?
Anyway, move in the right direction :)
Thanks for the clarification. I was, however, not interested in this specific information, rather giving my opinion about the "transparency" of the report. Some data might be boring, but still important in the matter of transparency.
Speakers costs includes flights or hotels for speakers who wouldn't be able to attend otherwise.
Misc (Miscellaneous) are all other small costs like payment fees, or accounting, or hosting - small & boring costs like that.
I think there has to be a good balance and if we will go for all details, it'd be just boring for most of the people.