[tinco]

Well you can't just fly 22,000km of cable into space with a rocket, and then drop it down. Using balloons to cover the first few km could save a bunch.

Also, there's a rather large difference between a multi-billion dollar internationally supported scientific operation, and a few million dollar marketing stunt.

If you can make a few hundred meters long carbon nano tube (which we can't right now), what's stopping you from making a balloon with a circumference of a few km, and how much cable could you lift up how high with that?

Since gravity decreases quadratically, the first miles are the ones that count.

[nickff]

Gravity does decrease quadratically, but the origin is the center of the earth, not the cable's anchor. The earth's diameter is over 12000 km, so gravity would not decrease significantly over the 10s of kilometers the balloons supported.

[tinco]

Argh you are right at 160km it's only dropped about 10%. It's a tough world out there :(

[JabavuAdams]

Well, to be fair to an otherwise impractical idea, getting up above the dense part of the atmosphere helps.

If you're trying to get to space quickly, then much of the air-resistance losses are in the first 10 km.

Look up "rockoons" for more info on replacing a rocket's first stage with a balloon platform.