|
|
|
|
|
by Rubikan
4444 days ago
|
|
If the Python core developers care so much about practical usage they should never have released python3 with features that break backwards compatibility. Your argument is right, but they should have thought about that before fracturing the python community. |
|
The Java model of using separate lifecycles for the runtime/JVM and the language itself is probably a good role model for the future; it allows introducing new language features without any danger of creating library inconsistencies and allows specifying source and VM versions individually.