|
|
|
|
|
by ceejayoz
4446 days ago
|
|
> Apparently the US State Department didn't learn from its arrogance in Iraq, because such blatant provocation shouldn't have been allowed. Provocation: Letting Ukraine voluntarily choose closer ties with the West Not Provocation: Invading and annexing the Crimea Gotcha. Also, since when is the US State Department in charge of the EU? |
|
Ukraine should have been quietly told that joining NATO or the EU was not possible.
>Not Provocation: Invading and annexing the Crimea
Strawman: This.
What Russia did is absolutely wrong IMO, but it is expected (just like the US doesn't like anyone else messing with South America or the Caribbean).
>Also, since when is the US State Department in charge of the EU?
The US has been the primary power in Western Europe since the 8th of May 1945. The US can directly control who enters NATO, and wields significant influence over the primary EU members. The possibility of Ukraine joining NATO or the EU would have gone through State and should have been firmly rejected.
EDIT: Downvotes and no replies, I can't tell whether I am on Hacker News or reddit.