|
|
|
|
|
|
by dm2
4444 days ago
|
|
|
After considering that some more, it seems like the court could (and maybe should) have ruled that it was simply a misunderstanding of the open-source code's license. It seems like a waste of everyone's time to even pursue a case such as this after it's determined that the person didn't have malicious intentions. Could the owner of the modified code successfully sue Goldman Sachs? |
|
|