|
|
|
|
|
by stingraycharles
4446 days ago
|
|
That's besides the point. It still costs money, and the company that's vulnerable is not the one paying it. A service like this would be time consuming (bogus reports, etc), and the EFF would still have to use money from donations to finance this. The only thing I can think about is some security firm doing this, using the exposure as a marketing tool and establish them as an authority on the subject. |
|