|
|
|
|
|
by MichaelGG
4447 days ago
|
|
> these VMs (or the runtimes) have had equally severe vulnerabilities I just looked at all the CVEs for .NET (62 of them). I did not find related to reading outside memory bounds or running arbitrary code. All the executable vulnerabilities were due related to loading code or escaping sandboxing: irrelevant unless you're running untrusted code in the first place. A handful of them were due to calling out to an unsafe native library, like to render fonts. The other serious ones were logic errors, for instance, ASP.NET returning file contents when it should not. So while technically the VMs/runtimes have bugs, they aren't remotely the same severeness. |
|
Maybe you could tell me why this one doesn't count though? http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms10-06...
This is just the first I found. Sorry I'm not being awkward, I just don't work with CLR/Silverlight. What in your mind prevents this remote execution exploit from being serious? CVE denote it as a 9.3 and Microsoft claim it allows remote execution on a server too (under some circumstances).