[jmspring]

The dynamics of which technologies find longevity on the front page is always intriguing. Erlang/OTP 17 was top for a short while, this random javascript framework hitting the top?

How is this more useful than a language/platform rev?

[argonaut]

It's not a random framework. It's been worked on and talked about for 1-2 years now.

[jmspring]

Maybe I gloss over most JavaScript framework posts, but first I've seen (and remember) for this one in the last year or so.

My general point is genericX.js seems to get a lot of up votes here relative to other language/framework topics .

[rralian]

Well, I think it's because mobile web is still a huge opportunity, and mobile website rendering still leaves a lot to be desired. If they deliver a simple-to-use framework that enables a superior UX on phones (looks like it, though we still need to see more), then that's naturally going to be very interesting to a startup/entrepreneurial crowd like hacker news. I've been following them since the periodic table example and am still eager to see it fully open up.

I also totally dig meteor as a huge step-up in how to build web applications. I think they solve a big problem that most people are still working on (react also looks interesting)... not having to duplicate your business logic and rendering code. I think that's a huge benefit to getting things done quickly. Plus you get real-time rendering of data changes in your app, largely for free.

So I wouldn't call these genericX.js libraries. I think they are enabling new opportunities and are worth the interest they're generating.