|
|
|
|
|
by steveklabnik
4447 days ago
|
|
They aren't individually created, no, but they do feed into each other. We, socially, consider 'women's work' to be less valuable then men. Hence, positions that have a gendered connotation have a difference in salary. Your (1) should mean that their salary is way _higher_ than programmers. Supply and demand, no? I also don't know if what you say is true. |
|
I definitely agree with this when we're talking about teachers, nurses, librarians, etc. but I don't think web/product/UX designer is a particularly gendered role. It just looks that way because there are so few working women programmers (in comparison to their solid majority of the population) and the sex ratio for designers is more even.
We consider designers to be less valuable than programmers because there are 5 times as many of them than there are programmers.
Of course designers do something that you can't, and if programmers were common, the designers would be calling the shots. Architects do something you can't, too, and they make a lot less than you do - because there's more of them than we need.