[sho]

It doesn't justify it, of course, but it does set the scene, as in it's quite likely there's been bad behaviour of some type. If we're going to be drawing conclusions about China's intentions, it behooves us to consider all the relevant information.

These mega-corps always work within the letter of the law, but not the spirit. They can wreak horrendous damage, taking actions in obvious bad faith, and yet get off scot-free because they've legally dotted every "i". Well, it would not surprise me if some part of Officialdom there is really pissed off at Rio for something they've done, can't actually hang anything specific on them, so is just holding them without charge for a while to punish them. That is also within the letter of the law, but not the spirit.

China could be sending a message here - "you play dirty, we'll play dirty". Anyway, just a theory and probably not a good one, but I hope it demonstrates that Rio's unclean hands are relevant to any discussion of the matter.

Simply stating "be too successful in China and this is what happens!" is unlikely to be the whole story.

[sho]

I'd like to follow this up with the information that Hu has now been formally charged:

http://www.businessday.com.au/business/rio-spy-case-stern-hu...

As expected, the charges are commercial bribery and obtaining "commercial secrets of China's steel and iron industry through improper means" in violation of "the country's Criminal Law".

I am not trying to whitewash China here, but I doubt this case is all that unreasonable, and I for one am hardly less confident about business dealings in China because of it.