|
|
|
|
|
|
by qbrass
4452 days ago
|
|
|
>And did he just write that kernel is just "an implementation detail?". In theory, systemd could be made to work on BSDs, Hurd, Minix, or whatever. In reality, I'd sooner expect systemd to provide it's own kernel, but you never know. |
|
|
My system isn't booting. I don't know why. I'll pass "debug" to find out. Right here, and now, the fact is that the problem could be in many places inside or outside the kernel including (but not limited to) systemd. Requiring people to understand the current low level structure of their OS just to get some extra debug reporting on a failed boot is exposing implementation details.