|
|
|
|
|
|
by bluntly_said
4457 days ago
|
|
|
I think once the legal implications are removed, churches would lose their control over the word by default. It doesn't have meaning outside of the church at that point, and the government "shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" So if gay people wanted to get married, no one could stop them. -- Side note, California had (and still does, as far as I'm aware) domestic partnerships. From the wiki page one it: It affords the couple "the same rights, protections, and benefits, and... the same responsibilities, obligations, and duties under law..." as married spouses |
|
|