[sorincos]

I see your point. In my environment communication makes only so much of a day's time and depending on how high this share is, an open office can boost or kill productive work. There's this concept of time slots which is completely failing in an open office environment - you can't honestly dedicate say 4 hours time at once for doing a certain task. Point is, an open office gives on one side (communication) while taking on another side (productivity time) and a certain company's mileage will vary way too wildly between these extremes. One compares always these schemes in terms of individual productivity vs. team productivity, but honestly said, all arguments seem to me completely random. There are no "standard" humans and when one will suffer from too much disturbance, its team will suffer too. And when one project will suffer from too little communication, the team will suffer too. What's the middle ground then? I strongly believe the "team room" is the sole setup which can be justified realistically.

[gtirloni]

I see my more "communication" inclined coworkers talking all the time in our open floor office. They talk about work for sure, but also jokes, women, soccer, etc. This is very good for socialization and building relationships but it's terrible when I'm trying to find out the root cause for a difficult issue.

It seems the has been too much emphasys on the socializing aspects of open floor offices and not the equivalent attention to concentration and flow required for the type of tasks we're assigned to.

[sorincos]

I'm working on the same open floor with people from another company with completely unrelated duties. I fail to see how this socialization is helping my own team's work (incidentally my team is NOT colocated). Nevertheless, officially we're happy open office users.