|
|
|
|
|
by empthought
4462 days ago
|
|
That link about the Cornell study is comically bad. Where are the raw data tables? Doing a little background research it seems they were comparing open floor plans to cubicles. They didn't even consider the obvious alternatives to the panopticon, such as remote work or the tried-and-true office with a door. |
|
It was a link to a summary of the actual study. With that said I went and skimmed the original study and that looked just as bad. Here's the original study.
http://iwsp.human.cornell.edu/file_uploads/offices1_12382569...
Forget the fact that they didn't have the raw data. They don't clearly explain on what basis they reach their conclusions.
How are they measuring the 'success' of an open floor plan? For that matter, how can you even measure the 'success' of an open floor plan versus a close floor plan?