|
|
|
|
|
by element4y
4466 days ago
|
|
This pattern of thought is not new as noted by another commenter but beyond that, it is dismissive. If, and a big if would be given should marriage be a truly sacred multi generational ceremony. It's not, it began with ownership of people and is presently accompanied by a farce of a concept that diamonds are actually worth anything. If you could look beyond that joke of a concept you can see it's really about EQUAL rights, not about samesies. To some the concept of marriage means something, to others it's a way to get insurance or better tax deals. This debate is about equal rights. period. As a side note, the only real argument i've heard against same sex marriage was it opens the doors to lawsuits, because if you have the same rights you can be sued you when you infringe them. And that's what the true opponents of equal rights fear. pps the only thing about the quote that makes any sense is it is wasted resources, this should not even be a debate. |
|