I never accused him of being a homophobe, I simply stated all that I can glean from the facts: he doesn't believe homosexuals should be allowed to marry.
So what? I know several homosexuals who don't believe homosexuals should be allowed to marry -- people who actually believe this is a regression to BS bourgeois values from gay people losing all perspective of 70's struggles (regarding liberation from antiquated values and institutions).
In general, taking a single issue and making it something people can lose their job over it, just because you have the power to push for it in the media, is very wrong.
At worse, what Brendan voted for would merely not let some gay people perform the same BS marital custom that straight people do. Doesn't compare at all to death penalty in my book --which costs hundrends of lives -- including of kids in places like Texas.
So, Should people who are in favor of the death penatly lose their job and have their CEO positions boycotted? Take you for example. What do you think about animal rights? Or the death penatly? Or gun control? Or drugs?
In general, taking a single issue and making it something people can lose their job over it, just because you have the power to push for it in the media, is very wrong.
At worse, what Brendan voted for would merely not let some gay people perform the same BS marital custom that straight people do. Doesn't compare at all to death penalty in my book --which costs hundrends of lives -- including of kids in places like Texas.
So, Should people who are in favor of the death penatly lose their job and have their CEO positions boycotted? Take you for example. What do you think about animal rights? Or the death penatly? Or gun control? Or drugs?