|
|
|
|
|
by anamax
6153 days ago
|
|
> Unix abandoned (or never had) any conception of WYSIWYG, and probably never will. I hate it, too. In this case, the complaint is that what you've got can't be represented by what you see. There are a couple of ways to approximately display what you see, but they're approximations. (One is wrap and the other is "off the edge of the screen".) In a WYSIWYG, you can't represent a line longer than the screen width. This is a problem when lines matter. That's why WYSIWYG is more accurately called "What You See Is All You Have". |
|