|
|
|
|
|
by knyt
4475 days ago
|
|
> you no longer have to manually specify cache sizes for tables to prevent running over memory and into swap I'm really glad you're addressing this. Does this auto-sizing apply to RethinkDB's memory usage in general? The last time I tried using it on a small VPS, I set my table's cache size really low, but I still ran out of memory whenever I ran queries on a large table. Definitely looking forward to secondary index export/migration and to upgrades without the export-import cycle. |
|
I'm also looking forward to stable formats and seamless migration, but it's a really hard problem. I think for the time being we'll introduce a stable branch, and users will have to pick between new features or stability. It's not ideal, but will give most people most of what they want.