[vezzy-fnord]

In a country run by the Republican party based on Christian laws.

The USA is based on Christian laws?

What?

No doubt there's a faction that is working on that goal, but that has never been the case in this country thus far.

Also, it's not like the Democrats (the party of the KKK) are much better in that regard.

[fennecfoxen]

>> In a country run by the Republican party based on Christian laws.

> The USA is based on Christian laws?

Forget that. The USA is run by the Republican party??!? I guess the Senate and Presidency mean nothing, then. Likewise the situation just a couple years ago when those accursed Republicans were so busy passing Obamacare...

[ryguytilidie]

"when those accursed Republicans were so busy trying to repeal Obamacare and having literally no other ideas at all...."

Yep, good summation sir.

[ryguytilidie]

Do you think Prop 8 is anything but a Christian law?

Oh wait I just tried to rationalize with a guy who compared the Democratic party to the KKK. Nevermind, good luck with being nuts.

[vezzy-fnord]

I did not compare the Democratic Party to the KKK, I was saying that it was the Democratic Party that primarily supported the KKK during most of its first two incantations.

Do not twist my words. If having a basic knowledge of U.S. history is being nuts, then so be it.

[mikeyouse]

I find it hard to believe you don't know that the parties of the 1860's and the parties of today aren't quite the same, but here's a primer:

http://www.livescience.com/34241-democratic-republican-parti...

    So, sometime between the 1860s and 1936, the (Democratic)
    party of small government became the party of big
    government, and the (Republican) party of big government
    became rhetorically committed to curbing federal power. 

Add on the Republican Party's Southern Strategy of the 60's and 70's, and it's pretty clear which of the two parties a KKK member would choose today. If the Southern Strategy isn't familiar, I'll let Ronald Reagan's Campaign Manager sum it up:

    You start out in 1954 by saying, “Nigger, nigger, nigger.”
    By 1968 you can’t say “nigger”—that hurts you, backfires.
    So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights,
    and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now,
    you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things
    you’re talking about are totally economic things and a
    byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.…
    “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the
    busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than
    “Nigger, nigger.”

http://www.thenation.com/article/170841/exclusive-lee-atwate...

[ryguytilidie]

"I did not compare the Democratic Party to the KKK, I was saying that it was the Democratic Party that primarily supported the KKK during most of its first two incantations."

wtf. You said nothing remotely close to that...Reread if you'd like:

"Also, it's not like the Democrats (the party of the KKK)"

Yeah, thats just like saying that they primarily supported the KKK...

"Do not twist my words. If having a basic knowledge of U.S. history is being nuts, then so be it."

...just wow. lol man. Maybe try actually having basic knowledge of us history?