[mysteriousllama]

What you are describing is autoconf, not make. Make by itself is actually a very handy tool for performing tasks that have a dependency graph.

Autoconf.. Well, I can't disagree. It's a hack built on top of a hack and should probably be rethought. Once autoconf is done generating Makefiles, make itself is generally trouble-free.

http://freecode.com/articles/stop-the-autoconf-insanity-why-...

[ArbitraryLimits]

Everyone says that, until they're put in charge of babysitting an old HPUX or AIX box and it's time to install something. Then no one complains about Autoconf again (though they can't bring themselves to praise it, either).

Automake, on the other hand...

[taybin]

I'm okay with autoconf. Automake however is an abomination.

[r0muald]

mk-configure is a "lightweight" autotools replacement

<http://sourceforge.net/projects/mk-configure/>