|
|
|
|
|
by ufmace
4463 days ago
|
|
I'm guessing that a big part of that is the combination of the potential for huge damages, and how big and public Google already is. One nasty accident followed by an ugly, drawn-out lawsuit could cause huge financial and PR damage to them. On the other hand, if you're a small start-up with no reputation to protect and not much capital to lose/go after, then worst case, you don't lose anything more than what's already been put into the single-purpose business. |
|
Especially if, Ford Pinto style, they've publicly stated that [for financial/reputational reasons] they shouldn't be as concerned about safety as another market participant, or that they should should aim to be "only just" better than fallible human drivers who frequently are held accountable for their fallibility.
I wouldn't want to be on the design team of a robotic car the first time it hits a child, even if the child acted in a reckless and unpredictable way that even a human mind would have been unlikely to anticipate and the software had demonstrated a far superior safety record to human drivers overall.