|
|
|
|
|
|
by motters
4468 days ago
|
|
|
It's amusing and attractively concise, but I don't know if it would really be legally valid. It seems to me that there are two options. Either you want public software to remain public, in which case use a copyleft license, or you don't care whether the digital commons gets gatecrashed by proprietarians, in which case use permissive licenses such as MIT or BSD. |
|
|