|
|
|
|
|
by chongli
4464 days ago
|
|
How do you decide the "50M who actually 'need' it" with vastly less overhead? We already do this with income tax forms. Furthermore, a 4k tax on 250M of the U.S. could be crippling to a good chunk of them. If your true point is redistribution of wealth, our tax system already does that and can do it more. But that's a different discussion.. That's what this is. It's very similar to Milton Friedman's negative income tax bracket. |
|