|
|
|
|
|
by MetricMike
4467 days ago
|
|
Most implementations I've read lean towards it being similar to a negative tax (there are other possible implementations out there). So if you file $0 income, you get a $10,000 credit/refund. If you make $200,000 income, you pay $20,000 in taxes. So taxes on the top brackets pay for basic income on the lowest brackets, with the understanding that the impact isn't changing much for most people because we already have a progressive tax system and this is just a simpler/more efficient way to distribute. |
|
I'm of the opinion that a negative income tax is a bad idea simply because it really does create the situation where the next dollar you earn on the low end can make things worse for you (or at least not improve them). Why even bother working at a low level job if what they pay you just comes out of your stipend? This is a problem mentioned with the current programs as well, where getting a job can get you cut off from the things that were saving your life, even if the job pays shit.
Pure basic income, on the other hand, means that every dollar you earn increases your income.